Journal List
ID883
Title International Journal Of Nutrition And Food Sciences
E ISSN 2327-2716
P ISSN 2327-2694
Country USA
Impact Factor Awaiting
Publication year 2012
Publisher NameScience Publishing Group
FrequencyBimonthly
Indexed Yes
Website http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijnfs


SIS Advertise









News

Given that the hemispheres are symmetric about the equator, you may think that, on both sides of the world, summers should be similar – both in terms of their climate and factors like their length. But are Northern and Southern hemisphere summers really the same?

Climate experts tell Live Science that they differ quite a bit — and that comes with a clear recommendation for sun enthusiasts.

The most obvious difference is that Northern and Southern summers happen at different times. According to NASA, this arises because Earth's axis is tilted 23.4 degrees relative to the plane of our planet's orbit around the sun.

This tilt causes the Northern and Southern hemispheres to be oriented toward the sun at different times throughout the year. Between the Northern Hemisphere's summer solstice and autumnal equinox, the Northern Hemisphere is oriented toward the sun, resulting in summer, and vice versa in the Southern Hemisphere.

This means that summers between the Northern and Southern hemispheres sit six months out of sync with each other — with Northern summers spanning late June to late September and Southern ones going from late December to late March. (Summers are also defined meteorologically, or relative to changes in weather phenomena, as being the hottest months of the year. Under this definition, Northern summers run from June to August, and Southern ones go from December to February.)

Northern summers are longer

Another difference between Northern and Southern summers is their duration. According to NASA, Northern Hemisphere summers are, on average, 4.5 days longer than Southern Hemisphere summers. (This is with respect to the astronomical definition; meteorologically, Northern summers are longer than Southern ones by two days in non-leap years, but this is due to February being the calendar's shortest month.)

The 4.5-day difference occurs because Earth's orbit around the sun is slightly elliptical instead of perfectly circular, according to NASA. Consequently, Earth's orbital velocity (the speed at which our planet hurtles around the sun) isn't constant.

Earth isn't the only planet that experiences such a dichotomy in the duration of seasons. According to NASA, Mars does too: Northern summers on the Red Planet are 24 Martian days — 24.66 Earth days — longer than the planet's Southern Hemisphere's summers. This greater difference is because Mars's orbit is much more oval-shaped than Earth's. (Image credit: NASA/ESA)

During the Northern Hemisphere's summer, Earth is farther away from the sun and thus moving more slowly, said Georg Feulner, a senior researcher at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. This is due to Kepler's second law of planetary motion, he added.

This means that at aphelion ‪(the point at which our planet is farthest from the sun)‬ Earth is traveling at 18.2 miles per second (29.3 kilometers per second). This jumps to 18.82 miles per second (30.29 km/s) at perihelion ‪(the point when Earth is closest to the sun ) which occurs during Southern summers.

While this may seem like a tiny difference in speed, it causes our planet's path around the sun to be 53,686 miles (86,400 kilometers) shorter in a 24-hour-interval at aphelion compared with at perihelion. In other words, Earth covers more "ground" at aphelion than at perihelion over a 24-hour-interval. "Therefore, the time between the Northern Hemisphere spring and autumn equinoxes is longer than the time between the Southern Hemisphere spring and autumn equinoxes, Feulner told Live Science in an email.

Northern summers are hotter

A third point of difference is that Northern summers are typically hotter than Southern ones. A 2015 study in the journal Climate Dynamics showed the precise value of this depends on whether temperatures are measured on the surface air, land or ocean, and the latitude at which they're taken. Nonetheless, when averaged over all domains and latitudes, Northern summers are 7.83 degrees Fahrenheit (4.35 degrees Celsius) hotter than Southern ones.

So what's behind this? Earth's changing distance from the sun isn't important. If it were, Earth's aphelion crossing during Northern summers should make them cooler than Southern summers during the perihelion crossing. Instead, several other factors are responsible.

One is the Northern Hemisphere's bigger fraction of land compared to its large water bodies like oceans. "Land has a lower heat capacity than water and so increases temperature more for a given heating than water does," Richard Seager, a professor at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, told Live Science in an email. As a result, the many inland sites in the Northern Hemisphere heat up rapidly and have higher summer temperatures, according to the UCAR Center for Science Education.

Additionally, Seager said, another difference lies in the way heat is distributed through air and water. The solar heat that land receives warms only the first few feet of the atmosphere, while the heat water absorbs gets mixed throughout its depths. This makes the Southern Hemisphere — with its larger fraction of water — cooler over summer.

The second factor for the North Hemisphere's higher summer temperatures are cross-equatorial ocean currents. Such currents cross the equator, transferring water and heat between the hemispheres. The primary current is the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC). "The AMOC transports heat from the SH [Southern Hemisphere] to the NH in the Atlantic," Feulner said. This warms Northern oceans and seas, which, in turn, heats up adjacent land-masses.

So, Northern Hemisphere summers are longer and hotter than Southern ones. If you want to stretch out your summer, you now know where to go.

How much do you know about our blue planet? Test your terran knowledge with our Earth quiz!

'> How do summers differ between Earth's hemispheres?

A chart showing the evolution of the universe, from the Big Bang to today. The first stars started to appear from the hydrogen fog a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. (Image credit: (NASA/Wikimedia Commons))

"We don't know exactly what objects caused reionization or how it evolved," Cody Carr, an astronomer who focuses on galaxy evolution at the University of Michigan and first author of a new study of the epoch, said in a statement. "We know that it took place, but we don't have complete answers to those questions."

Astrophysicists previously thought that this fog-clearing effect depended on supernovas, the violently explosive deaths of stars around eight to 50 times the mass of the sun.

But in the new study, published Oct. 15 in the journal Nature Astronomy, Carr and colleagues presented evidence that supernovas exerted the opposite effect, trapping the so-called Lyman continuum (LyC) photons of ionizing UV radiation that dispelled the celestial fog instead of scattering them.

"The most interesting thing about our paper is the observation that the strongest LyC emitters do not have fast galactic winds," Carr told Live Science via email. "This challenges the notion that galaxies require fast supernova-driven winds to enable LyC escape."

Which way the winds blow

The researchers used the Hubble Space Telescope to observe an analogue of the ancient universe in the local cosmos: six star-forming, wind-launching galaxies around 3.5 billion light-years away.

These compact starburst galaxies are generally smaller than 6,500 light-years in diameter and form around 10 solar masses' worth of stars per year. That star-birthing rate is several times higher than that of the Milky Way, which is up to 20 times larger.

The galaxies' spectra, or light-based fingerprints, revealed the origin, chemical composition, speed and direction of their stellar winds, which were whipped up by the radiation from their newly formed stars.

The researchers also described how these processes changed as the massive young stars evolved and died in energetic supernovas several billion years later, with the resultant galactic winds overpowering the stellar winds.

These nearby galaxies highlighted a counterintuitive two-phase process.

In the initial phase, which occurred during the first 3 million years of star formation, the newly formed massive stars' stellar winds carved through their galaxies' neutral gas and dust at nearly 2,000 miles per second (3,000 kilometers per second). This allowed LyC light to escape the galaxy and ionize the neutral gas and dust in intergalactic space.

The second phase, which emerged around 3 million years after star formation, seemed to reverse this process. As O-type stars — the hottest, bluest and most massive stars in the cosmos — lived fast and died young, their expelled stellar guts added to the opaque galactic gas and dust, churning it and loading it with mass, which created a trap for LyC light.

The oldest galaxies in this study ‪—‬ and, therefore, the ones with the fastest supernova-generated galactic winds ‪—‬ allowed the least amount of ionizing radiation to escape their environs.

"In general, our results are in disagreement with most cosmological simulations, which typically show the LyC escape fraction peaking after the launch of supernova-driven winds," Carr explained via email. In other words, supernovas didn't drive the Epoch of Reionization, but they may have dampened it. The intense light of newborn stars now seems like the most viable source of reionization.

Future research could aim to obtain additional galactic samples and higher-resolution observations across other wavelengths.

'> Astronomers may have been wrong about what ended the 'Cosmic Dark Age'

The artifact was unearthed at the archaeological site of Nishikaminomiya, northwest of Tokyo, according to a translated statement from Japan's Gunma prefectural government. At the site, archaeologists found nearly a dozen burial mounds known as "kofun" dated to the fifth and sixth centuries.

This time period in Japanese history, which lasted from about A.D. 300 to 710, is called the Kofun period. Many tombs in this period had cylindrical clay sculptures called "haniwa" that were used as offerings to the dead and were often thought to contain the souls of the deceased.

The newly unearthed haniwa is about 16 inches (40 centimeters) tall; but only the head and torso remain, so it would have originally been a lot larger. The figurine was discovered in a moat around an enormous burial mound that measured about 145 feet (45 meters) in diameter. It's likely that the haniwa was originally placed near a boat-shaped sarcophagus archaeologists discovered in the mound and that it slipped down the hill over time to land in the moat, according to the statement.

an aerial view of an archaeological site near a river

An aerial view of the tomb where archaeologists found the shrine maiden statuette. (Image credit: Gunma Archaeological Research Foundation)

Experts think the haniwa represents a female shaman known as a "miko," or "shrine maiden." These priestesses bridge the gap between the human and spiritual realms in the Shinto religion. During the Kofun period, miko would have performed important funeral rituals and offered spiritual guidance.

The haniwa figurine has a traditional Japanese topknot hairstyle called a "shimada," which indicates that the haniwa represents a miko, according to the statement. Both of the figurine's wrists have bracelets made from clay and red pigment. The haniwa's fingers have been carefully molded, and the figurine has a prominent nose. In addition, she wears a red sash painted on her torso and holds a rod-shaped ritual implement in her left hand.

"These details suggest that considerable care was taken in making the figure, even in features that would not be visible from a distance," representatives of the Gunma prefectural government said in the statement.

Archaeologists discovered the haniwa this year during excavations of the main burial mound at Nishikaminomiya, but they have been working at the site since 2020.

The haniwa is currently on display at the Gunma Prefectural Archaeological Research Center's Excavation Information Museum in the city of Shibukawa.

'> Ghostly statue of 'shrine maiden' discovered at 1,500-year-old burial mound in Japan

The new season promises to push the boundaries of underwater wildlife filmmaking, using next-generation camera technology including "splash drones" that can land, float and take off directly from the water.

Whereas "Blue Planet II" (2017) exposed the impact of plastic pollution, each episode of "Blue Planet III" shifts the focus to "stories of hope and recovery" across five spectacular marine habitats: tropical seas, open ocean, seasonal seas, polar waters and the deep.

The sixth and final episode, "Future Seas," will look ahead to the challenges facing our oceans and what we can do to protect them for future generations.

Read on as we show you where to watch "Blue Planet III" online and on TV.

How to watch "Blue Planet III" in the U.K.

"Blue Planet III" premieres on BBC One at 8 p.m. on Sunday, Nov. 1, and will also be available to stream on BBC iPlayer.

BBC iPlayer is a free streaming platform for U.K. viewers — although you will need to confirm that you have a TV licence.

Watch "Blue Planet III" from anywhere

If you're traveling abroad you can access your usual streaming services from anywhere with a good VPN.

A VPN — or virtual private network — is a piece of internet security software that can alter your device's digital location, unlocking the geo-restrictions on most streaming platforms.

Our expert colleagues at TechRadar rate Surfshark as one of the best VPNs. Not only is it great for unblocking streaming services, it has top-level security features, a reasonable price tag and, right now, a big discount.

Get Surfshark One for the price of Starter — just $2.49/mo on the 2-year plan

Surfshark is our favourite cheap VPN — and it's on sale today! We use it to watch streaming services from abroad, block ads, protect from viruses and more...

🏆 $2.49 / £1.79 per month
📺 Unlock streams abroad
✅ 30-day money-back guaranteeView Deal

Can I watch "Blue Planet III" in the U.S.?

Viewers in the U.S. face a three-month wait as "Blue Planet III" won't air on BBC America and AMC+ until 8 p.m. ET/PT on Saturday, Jan. 23, 2027.

The six-part David Attenborough documentary will air weekly on Saturdays, with episodes also available to stream on AMC+.

Remember, if you're from the U.K., but in the U.S. for work or on vacation, you can use a good-quality VPN to watch your usual British streaming services from anywhere.

Can I watch "Blue Planet III" in Australia?

Australian viewers will be able to watch "Blue Planet III" on Channel Nine, which has snagged the rights to the six-part Attenborough documentary.

However, an Australian premiere date has yet to be announced.

If you're just visiting Australia, you can always use a VPN to access your usual streaming services from anywhere.

"Blue Planet III" global trailer

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

'> How to watch 'Blue Planet III' online: Stream David Attenborough's spectacular new series natural selection over countless generations, not conscious choices. But a smaller set of animal behaviors look like something else entirely — deliberate tactical, and aimed at manipulating another individual's beliefs, the same way human lies do.

Figuring out which is which turns out to be one of the trickiest questions in animal behavior research, James O'Hanlon, zoologist and science communicator, told Live Science.

In this excerpt from his new book, "Liars, Cheats and Copycats: Trickery and Deception in Nature" (Columbia University Press, 2026), O'Hanlon explores camouflage, mimicry and misdirection throughout the natural world, building toward the book's central question: Can animals tell lies?

In it, O'Hanlon examines one of the strongest candidates for an animal that deliberately lies: the fork-tailed drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis), a small African bird whose ever-changing repertoire of false alarm calls has made it a favorite subject for scientists studying tactical deception.

James O'Hanlon interview: 'You start painting pictures of squirrels twirling their mustaches': A biologist on whether animals can lie

Live Science Pro

This is a Live Science Pro article that we're publishing for free to all our readers. If you'd like more exclusive book excerpts, as well as news analysis, scientist interviews and in-depth features, please consider subscribing.

Fork-tailed drongos are remarkable vocal mimics and can do an uncanny impression of a meerkat alarm call. The meerkats respond to it just as they would one of their own and scamper to safety. Meanwhile the drongo flies in once more to steal the meerkats' abandoned food.

They don't stop there; drongos mimic a whole range of other animals' signals, mimicking various avian neighbors like the caped glossy starling or the pied babbler. Those ever-watchful meerkats fall for the ruse once more, leaving their meals behind. Researchers have identified over fifty unique deceptive vocalizations in the drongo's arsenal.

By constantly rotating their "cry-wolf" tactics, these birds ensure their victims don't grow wise to the deception, allowing the theft to continue unabated. Yet, their cleverness isn't reserved solely for exploited meerkats.

This remarkable talent for mimicry extends to other creatures as well. Pied babblers and sociable weavers, who both forage in groups upon the earth, frequently find themselves bamboozled into fleeing their food by these false warnings. Had the legendary boy who cried wolf possessed such adaptive ingenuity, he might have successfully maintained his trickery.

It would, however, have resulted in a peculiar fable with an entirely different, perhaps darker, moral lesson.

It's early days in our understanding of whether animals can tell lies. Social group-living animals are likely candidates for finding animal tricksters in the wild, and we have only scratched the surface of what kinds of trickery goes on in these societies. Time will tell whether similar forms of deception are happening in the subsonic songs of whales and dolphins, the chemical mists of ants and termites, or the barks and howls of wild dogs.

a meerkat sitting up with grass in background

Meerkats are tricked by fork-tailed drongos mimicking the alarm calls, so the birds can swoop in and steal their food. (Image credit: photo by yasa/Getty Images)

Despite the growing list of evidence, scientists are still hesitant to conclude definitively that animals can intentionally deceive another, in a similar way to humans. This might have more to do with the professional conduct of scientists than it has to do with the reality of what goes on in animal societies.

Firstly, one of the most important rules in studying animal behaviour is to not anthropomorphise animals. In other words, don't project human-like qualities or emotions onto other species. Scientists must be completely objective and not assume that other animals think, behave or make decisions for the same reasons we do.

Since lying has always been perceived as a human behaviour, scientists are incredibly hesitant to conclude that it could be happening in other animals.

The second reason is that scientists are trained to never definitively conclude anything. There is an idea in science that you can disprove things, but never really prove things. This is why you will find scientific writing littered with phrases like "the evidence suggests," "it's probable that," or — my personal favourite — "the most parsimonious explanation is," and so on and so forth.

A professional scientist will often give a direct "No" answer but rarely a direct "Yes." It's like squeezing blood from a stone. But this is a good thing. What often sounds like indecisiveness or a lack of certainty is actually just good professional practice. It's part of a scientist's job description — to consider all possible explanations for the observations they have made and examine every possibility on its own merits.

Then the conclusions that are drawn come down to which of these possibilities is most likely. In a universe of infinite possibilities and scales of enquiry, it would take an impossible amount of overwhelming data for scientists to exclude all possibilities but one.

This article is adapted from Liars, Cheats, and Copycats: Trickery and Deception in Nature by James O’Hanlon . Copyright © James O’Hanlon 2027, 2025 First published in Australia by NewSouth, an imprint of UNSW Press Ltd. Used by arrangement with Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

Help us improve Live Science Pro: We're always trying to make our content better. Leave us feedback about Pro here.

'> Can animals lie? This sneaky bird might be proof.
Visits
Online User :
Today Visit :
Week Visit :
Month Visit :
Total Visit :
  • © 2013-2026
  • |
  • Scientific Indexing Services
3505 Brewster Drive, Plano, Texas, 75025, USA