strong El Niño has brought a rare gift to Chile's Atacama Desert: rain. In one of the driest places on Earth, that rare moisture has awakened millions of seeds and bulbs that can remain dormant underground for years, transforming the landscape into a spectacular carpet of color.

Known locally as "desierto florido," or "flowering desert," the phenomenon is one of nature's most remarkable transformations. Patches of purple, pink, white, red and yellow now spread across hillsides and plains that for much of the year appear almost completely lifeless.

"It is a unique phenomenon; there are more than 200 plant species," Jorge Carabantes, head of the Protected Areas Department at the National Forest Corp. (CONAF) in Chile, told The Associated Press. "This is a flowering event that is obviously extraordinary and unusual, very different from other blooms that occur elsewhere on the globe."

Typically, the Atacama gets just 0.6 inches (15 mm) of rain a year. But thanks to the super El Niño, record levels of rain fell between July and August in several Chilean regions, including levels not seen since the 1950s, with some areas receiving more than 7 inches (190 millimeters), Carabantes told the AP.

While this unprecedented precipitation has caused flooding in some areas of Chile, it's created a 6,560-square-mile (17,000 square kilometers) swath of flowering blooms across the Atacama Desert. This is the most extensive desert bloom since 1997, CONAF representatives told the AP.

For photographers and tourists, the landscape is breathtaking, with bright colors contrasted against the dark Atacama mountains and Chile's cloudless skies. But the bloom is fleeting; by the end of the Southern Hemisphere's spring, many of the flowers will disappear, leaving behind seeds and bulbs waiting for the next extraordinary rains.

Here are five photos from Getty Images photographer Javier Torres that showcase the beauty of this rare event.

'> Colorful wildflowers bloom across Chile's Atacama Desert in wake of 'super' El Niño

In the study, published Friday (Oct. 2) in the journal Science Advances, the researchers argue that the absence of animal fossils in some exceptionally well-preserved ancient rocks doesn't mean the animals were absent from history. Instead, they suggest that the fossil record may be missing a key chapter of animal evolution, potentially pushing the origins of animals back to between 800 million and 700 million years ago.

This would place the emergence of animals deep within the Neoproterozoic era (1 billion to 539 million years ago), possibly before or during some of Earth's most extreme ice ages.

Even though scientists haven't found undisputed animal fossils from the Neoproterozoic, that doesn't mean animals didn't live at that time. Fossils can be absent from rocks for several reasons, including because scientists are looking in the wrong places or the conditions were unsuitable for creating fossils, making it difficult to determine the earliest evolved animals.

"Until that evidence becomes available, the precise birth date of the animal kingdom remains uncertain," study co-author Ross Anderson, an associate professor of natural history at the University of Oxford, said in a statement.

Where are the animals?

Until now, most researchers relied on the well-preserved rocks from the Ediacaran period, including the roughly 590 million-year-old Weng'an Biota in China, to investigate the timing of animal evolution. Because rock deposits there contain uniquely preserved microscopic organisms but no definitive animal fossils, experts have sometimes treated them as a kind of upper limit for when animals could have evolved.

"So the game is basically how much does it predate our first fossil discovery by and what happened in that evolutionary black box between when they actually originated versus when we get our first fossil window," Karma Nanglu, an assistant professor of evolutionary paleobiology at the University of California, Riverside who wasn't involved with the study, told Live Science.

But the researchers wondered whether other fossil sites from known animal periods actually had evidence of animal fossils.

To find out, Anderson and his colleagues studied more than 140 samples from the Kheseen Biota in Mongolia, which is more than 40 million years younger than the 590 million-year-old Weng'an Biota deposit. Given that it's a younger deposit, the researchers hypothesized that there should be evidence of animal life left in the rock. Using electron scanning microscopy, the researchers saw microscopic fossils preserved in extraordinary detail, including tiny, spherical organisms and embryo-like structures containing internal cells.

Yet, despite the quality of preservation, the researchers couldn't identify any of the microfossils as animals. That's important, because by the time the Kheseen Biota was deposited, animals were present elsewhere on Earth.

"The Kheseen Biota breaks the argument that the exceptional microfossils of Weng'an mean we would have seen animal fossils in the assemblage had they existed at the time," Anderson said. "The Kheseen microfossils are just as well-preserved, yet animals continue to be absent — despite the fact we know at that point they existed."

Using molecular clocks

Given the absence of fossil evidence, Anderson and his collaborators turned to another common method used to date ancient life: molecular clocks. Molecular clocks estimate when evolutionary lineages diverged by comparing genetic differences among living organisms and combining those differences with rates of genetic change. For example, if two bird species have five DNA changes and one DNA change takes about 1 million years to accumulate, scientists could estimate that the two species diverged around 5 million years ago.

"Molecular clocks are useful when we don't have a particularly good fossil record for a group of interest or a time period of interest," Nanglu said.

When the analysis was constrained by the younger Weng'an deposit, the estimated origin of animals was comparatively recent. When they used older geological constraints — specifically rock formations in Norway, Australia and Arizona deposited between around 850 million and 730 million years ago that have been used in the past for trying to find animals' early ancestors, the timeline changed. By comparing modern animal DNA to reference dates from the fossil record along with evolutionary rates of change — their estimate shifted back by roughly 200 million years, to between about 800 million and 700 million years ago.

"Pre-Ediacaran animal body fossils still elude us, and this analysis does not prove that animals existed 800 million years ago," study first author Orin Lole Durbin, a doctoral student of paleobiology at Virginia Tech who was a University of Oxford undergraduate at the time of the study, said in the statement. "Meanwhile, our molecular-clock analyses show how much further back their evolutionary history could extend."

Could animals have lived before "Snowball Earth"?

There are other clues that animals may have a longer history.

Chemical fossils, or biomarkers, have been interpreted as evidence consistent with sponges living at least 650 million years ago, tens of millions of years prior to the oldest known animal fossils.

If animals did originate 800 million years ago, their emergence would also intersect with the Cryogenian period, which began around 720 million years ago as part of the Neoproterozoic era. During this interval, Earth experienced enormous glaciations often referred to as "Snowball Earth."

Although there is no definitive answer to whether animals survived this uncertain time, the researchers plan to search additional Neoproterozoic rocks with different environments and preservation conditions to find more evidence for their analysis.

"Fossils themselves are by definition kind of hidden from general sight," Nanglu said."Beyond that there's an even more hidden world, and that has a lot of potential to tell us about animal origins."

Think you know about natural selection? Try your hand at our evolution quiz!

'> Animals may have evolved 200 million years earlier than previously thought, new study suggests "super" El Nino means the U.S. will likely face a higher risk of stormy weather and flooding, so experts are recommending Americans stock up on food.

And flooding is just one of the natural disasters people will face — many people are at risk of wildfires, power outages or earthquakes. While some disasters are unexpected, preparation can make a significant difference in how much they impact peoples' daily lives.

But is anyone actually prepared for the worst?

Levels of preparedness vary widely. Some may keep an emergency kit stocked with food, water and first-aid supplies, while others may have an evacuation plan, emergency contacts or designated meeting place for their household. And others do nothing at all. Although a recent study revealed there's no single place on Earth that's best prepared for global disaster, there are steps people can take to feel well equipped.

Experts recommend stocking up on food supplies and other essentials, especially in areas that might be more disaster prone. But how prepared are you? Answer our poll below, and share how you've prepared for emergencies or what you have in your disaster kit in the comments.

'> How prepared are you for a disaster?

"The evidence points to the arrival of humans ancestral to contemporary Indigenous peoples likely near the end of the Last Glacial Maximum, but earlier migrations may also have occurred," study co-authors Bethany Potter, an archaeologist at the Kansas Geological Survey, and Savannah Hay, a biological anthropologist at the University of Kansas, told Live Science in an email.

In a study published online Sept. 23 in the journal Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, the researchers used genetic evidence to investigate the three main archaeological models for Native American origins: an entry into the Americas before the LGM more than 25,000 years ago, entry during the LGM some time between 25,000 and 14,000 years ago, and entry after the LGM more recently than 14,000 years ago, sometimes called the Clovis First theory.

"The reason this topic is so contentious among anthropologists is because not all archaeologists agree about which of the earliest sites are legitimate, and that influences which model they think is most accurate," Potter and Hay said. "We know that humans were definitely in the Americas by about 13,500 years ago. We still don't know if they arrived earlier than that and, if so, how much earlier."

Genetic evidence of the first people in the Americas is scarce. The first whole genome from an ancient Indigenous person, who lived around 4,000 years ago in Greenland, was sequenced in 2010. Since then, the researchers wrote in the study, scientists have published around 250 whole genomes, along with genome-wide data from around 1,200 ancient Indigenous people.

These DNA studies have revealed key information about the first people in the Americas. During the LGM, around 25,000 years ago, a group of people living somewhere near Siberia or Beringia, which included the land bridge connecting Asia to Alaska, split into different groups ‪—‬ ancient Native Americans, ancient Beringians and one or more "ghost" lineages ‪—‬ and moved quickly along the Pacific coast, possibly splitting again around 16,000 years ago into Northern Native Americans and Southern Native Americans.

"Huge gaps in our genetic dataset"

Although the current genetic data lines up with archaeological evidence of people entering the American continents at least 14,000 years ago and perhaps as far back as 21,000 years ago, more DNA evidence is needed to fully understand how and when the first Indigenous people arrived from Siberia.

"There are huge gaps in our genetic dataset," Potter and Hay said. "For example, there are still no published ancient genomes from the Great Plains, despite that being where our lab group is situated." And these gaps could be hiding evidence of earlier migrations.

Human footprints found at White Sands, an archaeological site in New Mexico, have been dated to 23,000 years ago. If this date is correct, it implies that people were living there prior to the LGM. The Acoma Pueblo people living in the region of White Sands today recognize these footprints as traces of their ancestors, Potter and Hay said.

But genetic data from contemporary and ancient Indigenous peoples in the Americas currently shows that the White Sands population did not make a significant genetic contribution to the ancestors of today's Indigenous people, the researchers said. "However, it is possible we have not sampled their descendants' lineage, or that they contributed a low proportion of genetic ancestry to ancient North American populations," they said. "Perhaps we've just not found DNA from the White Sands population yet."

There are several scenarios compatible with a pre-LGM entry of people into the Americas, the researchers wrote, but assessing those models also requires more genetic data. To date, the earliest sampled genome is from a 12,800-year-old individual known as the Anzick-1 child, whose bones were found in Montana. Extrapolation from the DNA of the Anzick child and other early ancestors points to an initial migration that occurred no earlier than 21,000 years ago, Potter and Hay said.

"Expanding geographic coverage in general would be hugely beneficial, but many of us are intentionally slow with our ancient DNA approaches to ensure research relevant to descendant communities is ethical and collaborative," Potter and Hay said.

It is unclear when or if the longstanding question of when people first entered the Americas will be resolved, as current archaeological and genetic evidence do not unequivocally point to a single answer, Potter and Hay said, but "the publication of new ancient genomic data from the Americas is powerful, as it has the potential to fill in these gaps and reframe how we see these early peopling events."

How much do you know about the first people to reach the Americas? Find out with our First Americans quiz!

'> The ancestors of today's Indigenous people arrived in the Americas during the coldest part of the last ice age, study suggests Rosetta Stone" for translating coded historical messages.

Carter Church, an AI engineer at cybersecurity firm Sentinel One, laid out the findings in a post on X on Wednesday (Sept. 30), explaining how he gave OpenAI's new model GPT-6 Astra one prompt and one image to crack the centuries-old code. Six hours later, the task was complete.

"I didn't believe it at first," Church told Live Science in a message. "Everyone has the experience of seeing a model claim something outrageous, but the difference here though is that the solution is mechanically testable: there's essentially zero chance an incorrect key could produce coherent and historically consistent output."

The letter was sent in 1809 on Napoleon's request by his stepson Eugène, the viceroy of Italy, to Marshal Auguste de Marmont, who was stationed far from any other French troops on the eastern shore of the Adriatic Sea. The letter's purpose was to tell Marmont the position of every other French and allied army across the continent. However, to avoid revealing military secrets to France's enemies should the letter be intercepted, the message was written in code.

Church found the letter after searching for an appropriate code to break to demonstrate GPT-6 Astra's capabilities. "The verifiability of solutions is actually the most difficult part, far more difficult than generating potential solutions," Church said. "You simply cannot automate accountability."

According to Church, the only publicly available image of the letter was a low-resolution scan published in a French army journal in 1969. It contains 155 different signs — 1,300 signs in total — and the code is homophonic, meaning common letters have several interchangeable symbols.

But this low resolution scan and a single prompt was all GPT-6 Astra needed to transcribe the text and find a partial table by cryptology historian Daniel Tant — previously unlinked to this letter — that documented what 33 of the symbols meant, accounting for about a third of the letter.

"Astra made this connection itself via web research as it was investigating," Church said. "As I understand it: Tant catalogued the table as 'Code entre Eugène de Beauharnais et le Général Grammont' which may have been a naming mistake (Grammont vs Marmont?). Either way, Astra identified this example and just decided to try and apply it to this cipher...and it worked!"

GPT-6 successfully used the partial table to determine what each of the other symbols stood for and translate the message.

"This is a really interesting use of Artificial Intelligence, and it's refreshing to see AI being used productively to try and provide a credible solution to a historical mystery," Zack White, a history research fellow at the University of Portsmouth and host of the Napoleonic Wars Podcast, told Live Science in an email.

Michael Rowe, a researcher in European history at King's College London, added that the findings were "impressive" and that because we have access to Napoleon's original correspondence to his stepson, where he detailed what the ciphered message should include, we can be fairly confident in the translation of Eugène's letter.

"It's a bit like a kind of Rosetta Stone," Rowe told Live Science. "If you've tested out AI on this letter, where you pretty much know what the contents would have been because it's referred to in another letter, the AI does its thing and essentially reproduces what you're expecting to see. Then if you use the exact same kind of tool and methodology on something where you don't know [the contents], you're more likely to trust the outcome."

This does also mean that the translation of Eugène's secret message isn't too surprising to historians. "The cipher version just repeated a large segment of what's in that [original] letter, so in a sense it doesn't tell us anything new — it's not like it reveals some kind of great new information," Rowe said.

In addition to the positions of troops and their commanders, Eugène's message encourages Marmont not to fear opposition: "When you receive the order to march, you must not allow yourself to be intimidated by a few troops or a gathering of rabble," the newly-translated letter reads.

According to White, the translation does raise "some curious questions about Napoleon's mindset in the run up to the campaign in Austria in 1809." For example, he said that Napoleon actually had 60,000 fewer troops available to fight at the time than is claimed in this letter, and he also seems fixated on the number of troops Austria might send to invade Italy.

"It's important that historians now set the AI's works in a bigger picture of the history of the period," White said, adding "it will also be interesting to see if the key that has resulted from this AI's work can now be used on other correspondence."

Cracking codes in time

Ciphers were fairly common during this period, conveying sensitive military and diplomatic information.

"French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte was forced to use ciphers as a way of communicating sensitive information securely across his vast empire," White said. "It was always a very real possibility that these letters would be intercepted, potentially providing vital intelligence to France's enemies about the Emperor's plans."

However, using AI to crack these codes could also offer insights into the private lives of historical figures. "[Ciphers] were often also used for private correspondence," Rowe said, for example letters between elite individuals having extramarital affairs.

The technique could also be used by ancient historians, studying documents in languages and scripts that we don't yet fully understand, or written in illegible handwriting.

"Across time frames, this [AI] is opening doors," Rowe said.

For this particular cipher, Church said that the code itself isn't especially difficult. "Cryptographers could have cracked this easily given the time/energy," he said. However, it would require experts across different areas and take a considerable amount of time and effort, he added.

"Every field has an unsolved backlog of niche problems that specialists don't have the bandwidth to tackle," Church said. "The takeaway here is that the people shortening those lists will increasingly be outsiders who were simply curious."

Church's result was confirmed by Satoshi Tomokiyo, a patent engineer and cryptographer who runs a website documenting unsolved historical ciphers called Cryptiana, and the letter is now listed as "solved" on the website.

"This work is totally reliant on all of the research that goes into finding these ciphers, ensuring they're actually unsolved, contextualizing them, etc and I'd love for those folks to get all of the recognition," Church said, referring to Tomokiyo's website. "That's where the real hard work is."

'> 'A kind of Rosetta Stone': AI decodes 217-year-old secret letter ordered by Napoleon