Journal List
ID7724
Title Ladu: Journal Of Languages And Education
E ISSN 2774-194X
P ISSN 2774-2083
Country Indonesia
Impact Factor Awaiting
Publication year 2020
Publisher NameCV. Mitra Palupi
FrequencyBimonthly
Indexed Yes
Website http://alejournal.com/index.php/ladu


SIS Advertise









News

We've curated a list of the best models from each of the top camera brands, so no matter which system you want to invest in, there will be something for you here.

Best Canon cameras for wildlife photography

Canon EOS R5 II in the hand
Canon EOS R5 IIJase Parnell-Brookes
puffin on grass
Taken with Canon EOS R5 IIKimberley Lane
hoverfly on a leaf
Taken with Canon EOS R5 IIKimberley Lane
water crashing on rocks
Taken with Canon EOS R5 IIKimberley Lane
orange sunset silhouette
Taken with Canon EOS R5 IIKimberley Lane
rock formations at Marloes Sands
Taken with Canon EOS R5 IIKimberley Lane
Honorable mentions

Canon EOS 90D

If you prefer a DSLR and are happy to stick with a hobbyist camera that won't receive any future updates.

Canon EOS R7

A beginner-friendly wildlife option with a 1.6x crop factor to extend the reach of your lenses — effectively a cheat code for wildlife photography.

Canon EOS R6 II

If you like the look of the R6 III but want to save a bit of money, its predecessor is definitely still worthy of your hard-earned cash.

Avoid: Canon EOS R8

It's an excellent starter camera for more general styles, but the buffer fills up quickly and there aren't enough buttons and controls on the body to make it efficient for wildlife photography.

Best Sony cameras for wildlife photography

Honorable mentions

Sony A7R V

Stunning 61MP images, but with a much slower burst rate of 10FPS. It's long been our favorite Sony camera (until the new releases), and it's an excellent option if you don't shoot fast-moving animals or birds in flight. We've taken some beautiful wildlife images with it.

Sony A7 IV

A more affordable option here, and it still has AI-powered autofocus, although the 33MP sensor isn't stacked like the new A7 V. Plus, like the previous generation R model, it only has a 10FPS burst rate. Still, its noise handling is excellent, and it is suitable for more general styles of photography.

Sony A1

If you don't need pre-capture, go for the original Sony A1. It's still a wildlife powerhouse with the same 50MP resolution and 30FPS bursts as the new Mark II.

Sony A9 III

An absolute speed demon, but let's be honest — does anyone actually need 120FPS? Probably not. However, the Sony A9 III is considered to be one of the best cameras for birds in flight (BIF), but it'll be overkill unless you only shoot sports or fast-action bird photography.

Avoid: older or entry-level Sony cameras

Sony's entry level and older cameras tend to be capped at around 10FPS burst rates, and the older models also don't have any AI-powered autofocus features, which make wildlife photography much more fruitful. It's a shame, as there's no real "beginner" Sony wildlife camera on the market that suits these criteria.

Best Nikon cameras for wildlife photography

Nikon Z8 camera, pictured against a background of blurred green foliage
Nikon Z8James Artaius
Nikon Z8 sample image
Taken with the Nikon Z8James Artaius
Nikon Z8 sample image
Taken with the Nikon Z8James Artaius
Honorable mentions

Nikon Z50 II

A budget-friendly crop sensor (DX) model with flagship level autofocus and up to 30FPS bursts in a small, lightweight body. Plus, the 1.5x crop factor gives you extended reach when paired with full-frame lenses.

Nikon D850

Known as one of the best DSLRs ever made, the Nikon D850 is an incredible choice if you don't need the bells and whistles of a mirrorless — but keep in mind that it won't receive any future updates.

Nikon CoolPix P1000

If you need unparalleled zoom, the P1000 bridge camera has an insane 24-3,000mm zoom range. There are drawbacks, including the limited 16MP resolution and lack of weather sealing, but for beginners who want an all-in-one package for casual shooting, it's definitely worth a look.

Nikon D500

An affordable, entry-level APS-C model with 10FPS bursts, sharp 20MP images and fierce autofocus.

Avoid: Older DSLRs

Older DSLR models are typically much slower, have outdated autofocus and limited ISO performance for low-light work.

Best OM System cameras for wildlife photography

The author using the OM-1 Mark II in a hide
OM System OM-1 Mark IIJase Parnell-Brookes
dragonfly on a fence
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
duck flapping its wings in water
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
bee on a yellow flower in a field
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
ragdoll cat inside a house
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
Bumblebee in a blue flower in a field
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
dragonfly on a fence
Taken with the OM System OM-1 Mark IIKimberley Lane
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Shooting with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M1XJames Artaius
Honorable mentions

OM-5

If you want to save a few hundred bucks, get the original OM-5 instead of the OM-5 Mark II.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

It's not the fastest for wildlife photography with only 5FPS with tracking, but it's a great camera for casual shooters.

Best Fujifilm cameras for wildlife photography

Honorable mentions

FujiFilm X-H2

Where the X-H2S offers speed, the X-H2 offers a higher 40.2MP resolution, which offers more room for cropping. However, the autofocus isn't as good as on the X-H2S, and there's more rolling-shutter due to the non-stacked sensor.

Avoid if:

If you're a serious wildlife shooter, we'd recommend upgrading to a full-frame system from Sony, Canon or Nikon in order to get the best autofocus systems for your money.

Best Panasonic cameras for wildlife photography

Honorable mentions

Lumix S5 IIX

The video-centric sibling of the S5 II. They're very similar in terms of stills performance, so this might be the better option if you also focus on wildlife videography.

Lumix GH7

Primarily optimized for video workflows and other benefits that don't necessarily benefit stills shooters. It's a hybrid powerhouse, but stills-focused shooters should opt for the G9 II.

Lumix G9

The original G9 still performs well for general wildlife, with decent burst shooting and solid handling, but the contrast-based autofocus struggles to keep up with birds in flight and fast, unpredictable movement.

Best wildlife cameras: FAQs

What camera do most wildlife photographers use?

Dedicated wildlife photographers typically choose full-frame mirrorless cameras due to their larger sensor, better noise handling, accurate autofocus and rugged build. Many of these cameras also have fast burst rates, which is essential for capturing fast-moving wildlife or birds in flight.

Beginners and hobbyists can certainly get great shots with more portable models, but some compromises will have to be made in terms of speed and power.

What burst rate do I need for wildlife photography?

This depends on what kind of wildlife you're photographing, and how fast they move. Generally speaking, the best wildlife cameras have a burst rate of at least 20FPS (frames per second) — but the faster the better. If you photograph large, slow-moving mammals or stationary subjects, your burst rate doesn't need to be rattling off 40FPS at a time. If, however, you photograph birds in flight or fast moving animals, you will need a faster burst rate in order to capture that killer shot.

How many megapixels does a wildlife camera need?

There's no right or wrong answer here, but generally speaking, a higher resolution is preferred because it produces more detailed images, and you have more room to crop without losing image quality. However, more megapixels equals bigger file sizes, and you therefore need faster cards in order to keep up, especially when you're taking bursts.

That said, you can absolutely get some great shots with lower resolution cameras. We've been impressed by the quality of OM System cameras, and they typically only have around 20MP.

What is the best wildlife camera for beginners?

The most important aspect of a wildlife camera for beginners to prioritize is good autofocus. Provided your subject is in focus, you don't necessarily need the fastest burst rate, top of the line weather sealing or highest resolution.

For our money, Sony, Canon and Nikon offer the best autofocus on the market. We'd recommend the Sony A7C II, Canon EOS R7 or Nikon Zf for beginners.

How much should I spend on a wildlife camera?

You don't need to go overboard unless you're a professional wildlife photographer looking for the top of the range flagship models. You can get a really impressive wildlife camera for "most people" for anywhere between $2,000 and $3,000, but as many photographers will tell you, it's more beneficial to invest money in a better lens as opposed to splashing out on the very best camera.

Latest updates

'> Best wildlife cameras 2026: The ultimate buying guide to every major camera brand

Illustration of the flightless Jurassic bird Yuezhuornis yangyuanensis, which had features of both birds and dinosaurs. (Image credit: Mr. Chung-Tat Cheung)

Paleontologists in China have discovered a small Jurassic bird that was likely a land-based predator — like a carnivorous pheasant with killer claws. It had some features of birds and others of dinosaurs, suggesting that the earliest birds had a greater diversity of lifestyles than previously recognized.

Jurassic birds first emerged 150 million to 148 million years ago, and fossils of them are rare, so experts are just starting to understand how early birds diversified and evolved the ability to fly.

The researchers discovered the newly identified Yuezhuornis yangyuanensis in 2024, in the fossil assemblage known as the Upper Jurassic Zhenghe Fauna in southeastern China. It lived 150 million to 148 million years ago, roughly when birds started to appear in the fossil record. The team published their findings Wednesday (Oct. 14) in the journal Nature.

Analysis of the fossilized skeleton revealed the animal was small and weighed about 1.8 pounds (0.8  kilograms). "It was probably as large as a crow," Wang told Live Science via email.

Y. yangyuanensis had a mix of features seen in birds and predatory Deinonychosauria dinosaurs, such as Velociraptor, which are known for their sickle-shaped toe claws. It had deinonychosaur-like hyperextensible toes, with forelimbs that were roughly one-third shorter than its hind limbs. This is odd because modern birds and many other Jurassic paravians — the group that includes bird-like dinosaurs, including the ancestors of birds as well as modern birds themselves — have long forelimbs, linked to giving wings more lift force for taking off.

Y. yangyuanensis also had slender cranial elements and sparsely spaced teeth. These features, alongside the curved claw-like toes that were capable of securing prey, suggest that the animal's diet included meat.

"Its key anatomical features are the combination of dinosaurs' and birds' features: for instance, its teeth, pectoral gird, and especially the hyperextensible, 'sickle-clawed' second pedal digit are similar to that of dinosaurs," Wang said. Meanwhile, he said its slender cranial bones and bird-like pelvis are comparable to early birds.

This combination of features suggests that "the morphological gap between birds and dinosaurs is much smaller than we thought," he added.

Comparisons with 377 living bird species showed that the limb proportions of Y. yangyuanensis were most similar to those of terrestrial birds.

Wang suggested that Y. yangyuanensis was a flightless bird, but not one specialized to live in trees or wade in the swamps in the region. It was a small carnivore, with similar proportions to a pheasant, that was well adapted for running. "I think there are no directly comparable modern birds," he said.

The mosaic of features hints that Y. yangyuanensis may have occupied an ecological niche that was rarely utilized by early birds, and that there wasn't a systematic progression toward flight optimization, Wang said.

Despite being flightless, Wang and his colleagues place Y. yangyuanensis closer in the evolutionary tree to modern birds than to Archaeopteryx, one of the world's first proto birds, which lived about 150 million years ago and is thought to have been able to fly.

This adds to evidence that "the ability to fly arose not once, but several times among disparate groups of carnivorous dinosaurs that are closely related to birds," wrote Fernando Novas, a paleontologist at the Felix de Azara Natural History Foundation in Buenos Aires, Argentina, who wasn’t involved in the study, in an accompanying article in Nature. This includes flight evolving in early birds and in scansoriopterygid dinosaurs, which had membranous folds like the wings of bats, and the four-winged microraptors. Y. yangyuanensis seems to have taken a different road, eschewing the flying ways of its relatives.

"It highlights the extraordinary breadth of ecological and morphological diversification that took place close to the origins of avialans," Wang said.

'> Flightless Jurassic bird was like a carnivorous pheasant with killer claws

The underground impact structure, known as Ames crater, is located in northern Oklahoma and is named after a small town that sits above the submerged crater. At around 10 miles (16 kilometers) wide, it is the fourth-largest impact structure in the U.S.

Ames crater was created when an Eiffel Tower-size space rock slammed into our planet at more than 70,000 mph (110,000 km/h). At the time, the region was covered in a shallow ocean, and the crater was subsequently buried beneath layers of seafloor sediment. Therefore, there are no visible signs of the crater at the surface today. It was only discovered in 1991, when oil prospectors accidentally drilled into it.

Until now, researchers thought Ames crater dated to the Ordovician meteor event around 467 million years ago. During this period, an unusually high number of large space rocks smashed into Earth, likely due to the fragmentation of a single parent body somewhere in space. Scientists found fossils of marine animals in and around the crater that date to around the time of that event.

But in the new study, published July 7 in the journal Meteoritics and Planetary Science, researchers analyzed fracture patterns within tiny rocky fragments known as zircon crystals that were embedded in the underground crater. This revealed that the impact actually occurred 370 million years ago, around 97 million years after the Ordovician meteor event.

A satellite photo of the Oklahoma countryside with a large orange circle highlighting the location of the buried Ames crater

There are no visible signs of the Ames crater today. However, scientists have been able to map out its size and shape using ground-penetrating radar. This circle represents the rough outline of the the submerged structure. (Image credit: EarthExplorer/USGS/Landsat with annotations Harry Baker)

"No matter what technique we used, it was coming back to this younger signal," study first author Elizabeth Catlos, a geologist and planetary scientist at the University of Texas at Austin, said in a statement.

Reading crystals

Zircon crystals are tiny pieces of a superdurable mineral known as zirconium silicate. These crystals are scattered throughout most of Earth's rock formations, including most of the oldest known rocks on our planet. The near-industructible crystals are extremely useful to geologists because their internal structure preserves evidence of being exposed to extreme conditions, such as high temperatures and intense pressures.

Analyzing zircon crystals is now one of the primary methods of dating ancient meteor craters, and the technique has led to several other impact dates being revised. For example, in July, researchers in Australia revealed that the North Pole Dome crater was around 500 million years younger than initial studies predicted, and in 2025, experts found that the impact that birthed Scotland's Stac Fada Member structure happened around 200 million years later than earlier research estimated.

The crystals offer insight into what Earth may have looked like shortly after it formed and have recently been used to more accurately date the moon.

A microscope image of a zircon crystal

The internal structure of zircon crystals preserves evidence of being exposed to extreme conditions, such as high temperature and pressure, making them ideal for exploring ancient impacts. This photo, captured during a completely unrelated study, shows one such crystal under an electron microscope. (Image credit: Emmanuel Roquette via Wikimedia)

"These small crystals allow us to go back in time and learn about the major changes to Earth's ancient landscapes," study co-author Danny Stockli, a geologist and dean of the Jackson School of Geosciences at the University of Texas at Austin, said in the statement. "It would be great to do this for more of the meteor impact sites across the continent so we could get a more accurate timeline for these major events."

"This is where the impact belongs"

The crater's new age takes it firmly out of the Ordovician meteor event and places it into the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction event, also known as the Kellwasser event or the Late Devonian mass extinction.

During the Frasnian-Famennian event, which began around 372 million years ago and lasted for several million years, as much as half of all marine life went extinct as Earth's oceans were depleted of oxygen. The die-off, which was most likely triggered by global cooling due to increased levels of volcanic activity, is often cited as one of the five major extinction events in Earth's history.

The researchers emphasized that the Ames impact was not the cause of the Frasnian-Famennian event. However, they noted that the fallout from the impact, which would have injected huge clouds of dust into the air, may have contributed to the atmospheric cooling effect in the region.

It is an important reminder that the ability to accurately date specific events like this can inform our understanding of wider global patterns and trends, the researchers wrote.

"With this research, we're basically taking a major pawn out of the Ordovician Meteor Event and dumping it into the Frasnian-Famennian event, and saying, 'This is where this impact belongs,'" Catlos said.

The new study was dedicated to co-authors Andrew Parisi and Michael Brookfield, who sadly died before it was published.

'> One of America's biggest meteor craters is 100 million years younger than we thought — and coincided with a global extinction event case report. However, a CT scan showed no signs of swelling or hemorrhage in her head. The doctors attempted a lumbar puncture (also called a spinal tap) but failed to collect any cerebrospinal fluid that they could test for irregularities.

The doctors judged the girl to be too medically unstable to be referred to the hospital's psychiatric ward, so she was admitted to the general pediatric department. Pediatric neurologists suggested an electroencephalogram (EEG), a test that measures electric signaling in the brain, but this revealed no further clues.

On her second day in the hospital, the girl entered a complete catatonic state. Her specific symptoms were not described in the report, but in general, catatonia disrupts how a person processes and reacts to the world around them. Catatonic patients often stop moving and speaking. Doctors treated the patient with lorazepam, which slows down nervous-system signaling, and her catatonia subsided in days.

Meanwhile, interventional radiologists performed a successful second lumbar puncture, but the girl's cerebrospinal fluid appeared normal in the initial panels they ran.

After the patient had spent eight days in the hospital, psychiatrists recommended that the girl be transferred to their ward. However, this was not possible because she developed problems with feeding herself. Her continued psychotic symptoms were treated with the antipsychotic drug olanzapine.

The diagnosis: While initial tests of the girl's cerebrospinal fluid did not show signs of meningitis or other abnormalities, a later test came back positive for autoantibodies — immune proteins that target healthy tissues instead of foreign invaders. These antibodies targeted neuronal intermediate filament (NIF), a protein that helps give nerve cells structural support.

Based on this finding, the patient was diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, a condition in which the body produces antibodies that attack nervous tissue, leading to harmful inflammation that can cause psychiatric symptoms.

Autoimmune encephalitis is often triggered by a tumor; proteins produced by the growth can resemble proteins within nervous tissue, and the immune system develops a harmful response against the latter while attempting to fight the tumor. The doctors performed MRIs and a PET scan to look for tumors, but they did not find any.

The girl was diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, a condition in which antibodies attacked her own nervous tissue. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

The treatment: The girl received intravenous infusions of a steroid to reduce inflammation, as well as immunoglobulin — antibodies from healthy donors that are often used to calm autoimmune reactions. She also got an infusion of rituximab, a drug that kills B lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that makes antibodies like the ones attacking the girl's neurons.

In addition to these infusions, the girl underwent five sessions of plasmapheresis over the next month. In that procedure, blood is drawn from the body, a machine separates plasma (the liquid portion of blood) from blood cells, and the extracted plasma is substituted with a replacement fluid before that blood is returned to the patient. This treatment can help rid the body of autoantibodies.

The girl was discharged after having spent almost two months in the hospital. She was treated with ongoing prescriptions of olanzapine and lorazepam, as well as prednisone and monthly immunoglobulin treatments. As her symptoms improved over the following year, she stopped taking the psychiatric drugs but continued her immunotherapy.

What makes the case unique: Autoimmune encephalitis is rare. One study conducted in the U.K. suggests it affects only 5 to 8 out of every 100,000 people. Additionally, most data about the condition in pediatric patients comes from cases caused by autoantibodies that target NMDA receptors, which detect a key chemical messenger in the brain, rather than NIF.

The case report did not name a specific trigger for the girl's condition, but the authors noted that anti-NIF autoimmune encephalitis has been documented in adults following infections, including certain tick-borne bacterial infections, HIV and COVID-19. Cases associated with these infections are rarer than those linked to tumors.

The doctors did not attribute the teen's case to a specific infection, but her family did report that she'd had a cough three weeks before going to the emergency room. The family had visited the Philippines, and the girl and multiple relatives came down with the same illness.

For more intriguing medical cases, check out our Diagnostic Dilemma archives.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

Can you guess the diagnosis in these strange medical cases? Find out with our diagnostic dilemma quiz!

'> Teenager's rare autoimmune disorder caused her to hallucinate a flying green dinosaur

Laboratory analyses of specimens that died this year tested positive for the pathogenic bacterium Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, environmental authorities in Chubut province told Live Science. E. rhusiopathiae was first identified in southern right whale calves in 2013, but scientists don't know what might have changed this year to cause an infection-driven die-off of this magnitude.

Researchers say they need to quickly find the answer to better understand the changing threat this species faces, the risk to the wider ecosystem and humans, and what can be done to manage it.

"The battle between living organisms and pathogens is constant," said Carla Fiorito, a researcher at the Center for the Study of Marine Systems (CESIMAR) who previously identified the bacterium in right whales. "But for this to happen now, there must have been a shift in the balance between the agent, the host, and the environment," she told Live Science.

Record-breaking number

The first dead calves appeared on the beaches of Península Valdés in June, at the start of the breeding season, which runs through to December. Península Valdés is located in Chubut province, on the coast of northern Patagonia.

In a typical year, calf mortality reaches 20% to 30% of a cohort from various causes, including infections. But this year's losses have already far surpassed that.

In September, 409 calves were counted among a total of 1,375 southern right whales during a survey conducted by CESIMAR's Marine Mammal Laboratory. With more than 300 deaths already recorded, the die-off represents an exceptional proportion of these calves. The final figure will be released by the Southern Right Whale Health Monitoring Program in December.

Scientists have responded by expediting routine research to determine what's different this year to previous years.

"Samples were sent for analysis earlier than usual — typically, they are analyzed at the end of the year — because the higher-than-usual mortality is a cause for concern," said Víctor Fratto, the director of the Native Wildlife Rescue Program and a contributor with the whale monitoring program. "What those samples are showing is that the calves died from erysipelas," he told Live Science.

A known bacterium full of unknowns

A person suffering from a case of facial erysipelas. (Image credit: CDC/Dr. Thomas F. Sellers/Emory University, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)

Erysipelas is a bacterial infection that affects the skin. In its most severe form, it can spread through the bloodstream and cause a systemic infection, damaging vital organs and sometimes leading to death. Animals that catch the disease, for example through a wound, may develop characteristic skin lesions, which are rhomboid or rectangular in shape, caused by alterations in the blood vessels.

The bacterium that causes erysipelas, E. rhusiopathiae, is not exclusive to whales. It can be found in marine environments and in a wide variety of animals, including fish, crustaceans and birds. Pigs are one of its natural reservoirs.

"It is a ubiquitous and opportunistic bacterium," Fiorito said. (The human illness of the same name is different and caused by Group A streptococcal bacteria, although humans can also catch the E. rhusiopathiae form of the illness.)

The presence of E. rhusiopathiae does not necessarily mean an animal is diseased. Yet many questions remain about E. rhusiopathiae in whales.

"We don't know much about the bacterium itself; we don't know which serotypes are present in the whales, or how common it is in healthy animals or other species," Fiorito said. "There is also no data on the environment."

Calves are especially vulnerable because their immune systems are still developing and they spend more time at the surface than adults do, exposing them to more attacks by gulls, which can transfer the disease.

"The working hypothesis is that the gull is the vector: Pecking causes wounds on the back, allowing the bacteria to enter," Fratto said. "The bacteria might already be present on the skin, or they could be carried on the beak of a gull that had previously pecked another whale suffering from erysipelas."

The potential role of gulls

Attacks by kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) on southern right whales were first recorded at Península Valdés in the 1970s. The behavior began with just a few individuals in Patagonia's San José Gulf and became increasingly frequent over time, Ricardo Bastida, a marine biologist and professor emeritus at the National University of Mar del Plata who has studied these cetaceans for more than four decades, told Live Science. The birds also began scavenging the carcasses of stranded whales, Bastida said

Gull populations have grown and new breeding colonies have emerged in the region thanks to increased food availability linked to fishing activities and discarded catch, he noted. However, the attacks alone do not explain the 2026 mortality event: They have been occurring for decades, and gulls are a regular part of the ecosystem.

The working hypothesis is that the gull is the vector: Pecking causes wounds on the back, allowing the bacteria to enter.

Víctor Fratto, director of the Native Wildlife Rescue Program and a contributor with the whale monitoring program

Fratto said that swabs will be taken from gulls to check for the presence of E. rhusiopathiae and assess whether the results could help develop a management strategy for the species.

Diego Rodríguez, a marine biologist at the National University of Mar del Plata, said that research must go beyond the dead calves and examine the ecosystem's fauna to determine where the bacterium is present and how it might be circulating. "It is far more likely that [the die-off event] is linked to cross-infection," Rodríguez told Live Science.

What changed this year?

The major question for scientists is what might have changed this year to cause a bacterium already present in the ecosystem to trigger a die-off of this magnitude. Experts told Live Science they believe the phenomenon could be the result of several factors acting simultaneously.

"The bacterium was present, but this year it resulted in a widespread infection, making this event unusual," Mariano Coscarella, a researcher at the Marine Mammal Laboratory at CESIMAR, told Live Science. "It is a major step forward to have a fairly clear idea of what caused the disease, but we do not know what changed."

One factor could be the environment. Changes in water temperature, salinity, pH or rainfall could alter the conditions under which infection occurs. There could also be changes in food availability, affecting the mothers' body condition and the vulnerability of their calves. Another possibility is that the pathogen itself has changed — for instance, through the emergence or increased circulation of a more virulent strain or a different serotype, Fiorito said.

The El Niño phenomenon could also play a role by altering oceanographic conditions and food availability, although the researchers said there's insufficient evidence to link it to the die-off.

It is too early to determine what impact this die-off will have on the southern right whale population. Rodríguez suggested that losing such a large proportion of a season's calves could have demographic consequences. "It is very risky to predict what will happen in the future at this stage, but clearly, this year's cohort of live-born calves will essentially be absent from the adult records of future populations," he said.

Coscarella is more cautious. Southern right whales are extremely long-lived, and calves represent only a fraction of the population. Therefore, a single season of exceptionally high mortality does not necessarily mean the population will go into decline, he argued. "What would be concerning is if there were two, three or four episodes like this," he noted.

The event also has public health implications. Fiorito pointed out that erysipelas can infect humans, usually through skin wounds. The whales' carcasses could also pose a risk of exposure to anyone coming into contact with them, as could seawater for people swimming in the area.

Help us improve Live Science Pro: We're always trying to make our content better. Leave us feedback about Pro here.

'> Hundreds of whale calves have mysteriously died in Patagonia — and scientists are racing to find out why
Visits
Online User :
Today Visit :
Week Visit :
Month Visit :
Total Visit :
  • © 2013-2026
  • |
  • Scientific Indexing Services
3505 Brewster Drive, Plano, Texas, 75025, USA