Journal List
ID4231
Title Journal Of Preventive Medicine
E ISSN 2423-429X
P ISSN 2476-7182
Country Iran
Impact Factor Awaiting
Publication year 2014
Publisher NameHormozgan University of Medical Sciences
FrequencyQuarterly
Indexed Yes
Website http://jpm.hums.ac.ir/index.php?&slct_pg_id=125&sid=1&slc_lang=en


SIS Advertise









News
, a form of revenge, a warning against getting too close to the pod, or even a type of cultural transmission, in which one orca observes another interacting with a boat and then imitates it.

But Christian Frings, a cognitive psychologist who studies how humans control their actions, thinks it could be deliberate.

While Frings, who is also chair of general psychology and methodology at Trier University in Germany, does not study orcas directly, he believes that theories developed to explain human behavior could provide insight into this orca behavior. Orcas (Orcinus orca), he said, may be a "test case" for whether a wide variety of species can anticipate how their actions will change the environment and then take those actions deliberately, with the goal of making those changes.

He published his theory as a commentary Sept. 8 in the journal Animal Cognition.

This doesn't necessarily mean orcas have wicked motives or are ramming boats with the goal of sinking them and scaring or harming people. It may be that orcas just like the sensation of smashing into a rudder or being in the water with a wonky, disabled boat. Once they learn this, they anticipate the effect — for example, how a boat moves or feels when the rudder is damaged — and then carry out the learned action sequence that creates that effect.

Frings' theory doesn't attempt to explain why orcas (also called killer whales) would seek to damage a boat or rudder. "Why they want this effect is a secondary question and while of course interesting it touches a quite different topic," Frings told Live Science via email.

Live Science spoke with Frings about his hypothesis and why theories that describe how humans execute a series of motor behaviors — called action control frameworks — might help us understand how other complex animals behave in the wild.

Kenna Hughes-Castleberry: Why is it important to study orca behavior, and what can studying orcas tell us about animal cognition?

Christian Frings: In truth, I'm the wrong person to get that question because I should mention right from the start that I'm a cognitive psychologist. So usually, I'm studying human behavior. So, it's not really that I'm interested in orcas, per se, more in the question of what is actually comparable between human action control, human cognition and animal cognition.

KHC: Can you explain the action-control framework for our readers?

CF: It's a group of theories. The most important point is that agents — humans and maybe orcas — control their actions by actually anticipating the behavioral and the sensory consequences of their actions.

So let's take the example of turning the light on. The action starts with anticipating how it will look when the light is turned on. It does not start with pressing the light switch. It starts with the visual effect you're going to produce. This visual effect then actually retrieves from memory a motor program, and this motor program actually produces the anticipated effect. So it's all about anticipating action effects.

In the human action-control literature, that is the most dominant view from different theories of how humans actually control their behavior: by anticipating the effects they're going to produce.

KHC: How does that apply to the orca behavior?

CF: The typical explanation for [the boat-attacking behavior] is more stimulus response or cultural transmission. Stimulus response would mean, in this case, the rudder elicits an approach or attack behavior. So any rudder should just elicit this behavior. [Editor's note: Stimulus-response theory is a psychological concept in which a stimulus triggers a particular response from an individual. Examples include a cat being sprayed with water when on the couch and jumping off the couch in response, or a dog salivating when it smells food.]

Cultural transmission would actually be observational learning. That means one orca sees how another orca is attacking a rudder and then just imitates the behavior.

I'm not saying that these explanations [stimulus response or cultural transmission] are wrong, by the way. I just want to add an additional layer of explanation.

I suggest that they actually anticipate the sensory consequences of their action. So maybe they anticipate how it would look and how it would feel if they destroy the rudder. I would not call it [their behavior] play, but maybe they're just testing or probing what kind of effect they're going to produce.

It's a little bit like human babies, when they start to move — or move their arms or move their legs — they're also typically trying to produce effects, right? It's also when they develop language, this kind of babbling, right? That is a kind of testing or probing action effects.

Maybe this is something the orcas also do. I don't know. But at least it's [another theory].

Whale-watching tours help the public see orca behavior from a close-but-safe distance. (Image credit: Francesco Riccardo Iacomino via Getty Images)

KHC: So would the orca be anticipating something like the boat becoming impossible to steer?

CF: Actually, no. Let's assume for a moment it [that a broken rudder is] what they want to produce — because they somehow anticipate how it would look and how it would feel if this yacht cannot be steered anymore.

If they can anticipate, then this anticipation of this effect will retrieve from their memory what they have to do to actually produce this effect. And it's not about [higher-order] thinking. That is a very important thing.

So we do not need human-like intentions to impose that on the orcas. I'm not saying that, because I really think it's, in a way, comparable with turning a light on. When you turn your light on, you also do not have big thoughts about that. You just want to turn your light on. So you want to produce an effect, and you do not think about all the different, quite complex muscle movements you have to do if you actually press the light switch.

I would say, again, it does not really need higher-order cognition or something like that. We do not have to impose motives or complex thoughts on the orcas for that.

My point is just to look at this behavior from this somewhat different angle, adding this layer about action effects.

Christian Frings

KHC: What are the bigger implications if your theory is correct?

CF: My point is just to look at this behavior from this somewhat different angle, adding this layer about action effects. Because if you, for a moment, take my ideas for granted and say, "OK, maybe he has a point," then this opens up the possibility to manipulate the orca behavior.

Because if the orcas anticipate effects and this action effect produces a certain behavior, if you change the effect — let's say the rudder [material] or the shell of the boat so that the orca thinks he's producing a certain action effect — then he shows his behavior, but this behavior does not produce the action effect anymore. So the orca will probably change the behavior. It might be dangerous because it might elicit somewhat different — maybe even more dangerous — behavior of the orcas, but it might also stop it.

But it gives you a natural angle to manipulate the orca behavior. [Editor's note: In a follow-up email, Frings noted that this could involve testing a different version of the boat rudder. If the original rudder, when damaged, leaves the boat floating in a "helpless" way, a second one could be tested that allows the boat to be maneuverable even when attacked. If Frings' hypothesis is right, then by breaking the link between the orcas' planned actions (ramming the boat) and the outcome they want (helpless boat), you could change the orcas' behavior.]

But again, if you try to change it this way, it might be a little bit dangerous. So I would not suggest doing that with a boat with real people on it, because if you change the environmental consequences, they [the orcas] might actually go a little bit crazy. Maybe they might try to produce this effect with a different kind of behavior, and that could be even more aggressive. But I don't know. I can't predict that.

KHC: So the orcas are a case study to test this framework, right?

CF: Exactly. And for the general approach, it's important to try to find action frameworks that can travel across species that are not specific for one particular species. Because at the moment, we might have action-control models for humans or action-control models for the great apes.

But maybe we can just have a family of action-control frameworks, because maybe orcas and humans, and at least the great apes, control their behavior concerning action effects in quite the same way, to be honest.

Another important point here that makes it, for me personally, very interesting: This is behavior in the wild. So a lot of the research on action control is typically in the lab under very controlled conditions, so in a way, this is moving from humans to orcas but also from lab into wild behavior.

I think one misconception is actually that the models from the lab are not applicable to behavior in the wild. That's not only true for orcas; it's also true for humans. And I don't like that.

And again, this paper is a nice showcase that lab models can actually be used to explain behavior in the real world.

This interview has been condensed and edited lightly for clarity.

Help us improve Live Science Pro: We're always trying to make our content better. Leave us feedback about Pro here.

'> A psychologist explains his theory for why orcas are attacking boats

The observatory is the latest victim of intense solar activity, which increases the drag on satellites in Earth orbit and makes it harder for spacecraft to stay aloft. Swift has been losing altitude for a while, but the final straw came in August, when a costly mission to boost Swift's orbit with a private spacecraft failed, ending with the would-be rescue craft burning up in the atmosphere after a series of hardware malfunctions.

Swift is now beyond saving and, orbiting at just 171 miles (275 kilometers) above Earth, can no longer take reliable observations of space. NASA expects the spacecraft to break up upon reentry "in the next few weeks."

NASA knew Swift was in trouble when it went in; soon, it'll be lying on the cold hard ground. However, the Swift mission surpassed its goals by decades. According to NASA, the satellite launched in November 2004 on a primary mission intended to last just two years. In the end, Swift survived for 22 years, surpassing its intended lifespan by more than 10 times.

In that time, Swift made thousands of observations of exploding supernovas, intense gamma-ray bursts, and black-hole-related episodes of stellar destruction, contributing data to about 7,000 scientific papers, according to NASA.

An illustration of a stellar 'mega-flare' detected by Swift. The observatory excelled at catching powerful, fast-acting cosmic events. (Image credit: NASA Goddard)

Designed as a multiwavelength observatory, Swift watched the sky in optical, ultraviolet and X-ray light that made it well suited to track the aftermath of powerful energy bursts. Its greatest asset, perhaps, was its rapid response time; if an explosion flashed somewhere in the sky, engineers could swivel Swift to study it within minutes, NASA said.

"Swift was designed as a satellite dedicated to studying gamma-ray bursts, outbursts that came and went so quickly that no one could target them with large telescopes to learn more," S. Bradley Cenko, the mission's principal investigator at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said in the statement.

Swift's fast-acting observations "played a major role in advancing our understanding of the changing universe and was part of a revolution in astrophysics," added Shawn Domagal-Goldman, director of the Astrophysics Division at NASA headquarters.

'> NASA's Swift observatory ends 22-year mission, will crash to Earth 'in the next few weeks'

The IceCube facility, photographed here beneath the Southern Lights, is Earth's premier neutrino detection facility. The proposed 'right-handed' neutrino has not yet been detected. (Image credit: IceCube/NSF)

The cosmic seesaw

In quantum physics, particles that mix can exist as a blend of two identities at once. In a theoretical framework called the seesaw mechanism, each ordinary neutrino carries a faint trace of a heavy right-handed partner, and that trace gives it a tiny mass. The heavier the partner, the fainter the trace and the lighter the ordinary neutrino — hence the name, after the playground ride whose ends move in opposite directions.

The particles could solve other puzzles, too. They "aim to address several issues, including the origin of neutrino masses, the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe, and the nature of dark matter," Roshan said.

The Big Bang should have made equal amounts of matter and antimatter, which would have annihilated each other, forbidding the universe as we know it from ever taking shape. Right-handed neutrinos play a crucial role in models' proposals that the "observed matter-antimatter imbalance arose from processes involving these neutrinos in the early universe," Roshan said.

In this picture, decaying heavy neutrinos left behind a slight excess of leptons — the particle family that includes electrons — that later became today's surplus of matter, he explained.

The seesaw framework usually includes three right-handed neutrinos, but because two are enough to explain the data, physicists often ignore the third, assuming it is too heavy or interacts too feebly with matter.

How the heaviest neutrino took over

In the new study, Roshan and Sudipta Show, a physicist at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, examined what this neglected particle — which, in the team's main example, was about 100 trillion times as heavy as a proton — would have done after the Big Bang.

At first, the particle would have zipped around at nearly light speed, so its energy would have faded like that of light, which would have both spread out and stretched to weaker wavelengths as space expanded. But as the cosmos cooled, the particle would have slowed down and most of its energy would have become locked in its mass, which would have been only spread out. Its share of the cosmic energy therefore would have grown until it dominated, and the long-lived particle would have stayed in charge until it decayed into other particles, according to the team's computations.

The study reveals that the neglected right-handed neutrino "significantly impacts the early universe's expansion dynamics, driving a period of early matter domination," Roshan said. This change "affects various Standard Model interactions"‬ that could help to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry, Roshan added.

Each interaction would have switched on only once it outpaced the expansion of space. Because a universe dominated by the heavy neutrino would have expanded faster, the interactions would have had to wait until it cooled further.

These interactions would have let the early universe distinguish lepton flavors, which would have affected how the matter surplus formed. Thanks to the delay, the team found, a lighter right-handed neutrino about 100 billion times as heavy as a proton could have produced the observed amount of matter before the flavors could be told apart — even after the heavy neutrino's decay diluted part of it.

Hard to test, but not out of reach

The heavy neutrino is far too massive to create in any particle accelerator, so tests must be indirect.

Gravitational waves — ripples in space-time — offer one such route. An era dominated by the heavy neutrino would have left a telltale kink in the background of early-universe gravitational waves, such as those from "cosmic strings" ‪—‬ hypothetical thread-like defects in space. The results can be tested through forthcoming facilities such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and the Square Kilometer Array Observatory (SKAO), Roshan noted.

LISA, a space-based European Space Agency mission, is scheduled to launch around 2035, while SKAO, a giant radio telescope project being built in Australia and South Africa, could catch such waves by timing distant pulsars. Tests could come "as these facilities come online and begin data collection," Roshan said. A faint hum from the hot primordial plasma would carry the era's imprint too, but at frequencies beyond what existing detectors could pick up.

'> A neglected particle from the dawn of time could explain why everything in the universe exists

These landslides, called permafrost detachment slides, occur in areas with relatively thin permafrost and seem to be a long-term impact of wildfire in these environments, according to a paper published Sept. 23 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. Such slides have not been observed in the region before and may be unprecedented over the past 10,000 years or more, said study leader Joseph Young, who completed the work as part of his doctoral degree at the University of Alberta.

"It has been stable, and then it just flipped a switch, essentially," Young told Live Science.

Young and his colleagues were doing field observations in Canada's Northwest Territories when they noticed large landslide scars in valleys that have long hosted stable permafrost, which is sediment that remains frozen year-round. They began using satellite imagery to map the changes and also conducted fieldwork, which revealed that the slides weren't standard melting permafrost.

"Typically with permafrost, everything just thaws and melts in a slurry and moves like a mud downslope," Young said. "But with these large landslides, we found blocks of frozen material in the debris."

Some of these blocks were 33 feet (10 meters) tall, the height of a two-story house. The researchers ran an electrical current through the ground to determine the depth of the permafrost on the slopes.

They focused on two slides. One, in the Johnson River Valley, took place in 2017 and moved more than 636 million cubic feet (18 million cubic meters) of soil and rock. The other, in the Redstone River Valley, moved almost 159 million cubic feet (4.5 million cubic meters) of debris in 2018. The smaller slide left a scar three-quarters of a mile (1.2 kilometers) long, while the larger one gouged nearly 2 miles (3.2 km) out of the hillside.

The researchers then used the data they'd collected to build a model of how these icy slides occurred. The permafrost in this area has been warming by about 0.54 degrees Fahrenheit (0.3 degrees Celsius) per decade since 1980, when monitoring began, and there were also severe wildfires nearby in 1995.

The researchers found that instead of a top-down melting process by which the permafrost thawed to a muddy slurry from above, the slides were instead caused by a combination of fire-related thaw and warming temperatures, leading to cracks near the top of the slopes. These cracks allowed the thaw to penetrate deeper, eventually melting the bottom of the permafrost layer. This propagation can take 20 years to penetrate 66 feet (20 m), which is exactly what happened in the Johnson River and Redstone River valleys.

"We had a fire in '95 and then 20 years later, we start to get a lot of these widespread disturbances," Young said.

The two large slides the researchers studied are among more than 150 in the area, Young said. The others are smaller, but they still typically move over 35 million cubic feet (1 million cubic meters) of land apiece. Canada's Northwest Territories are remote, so the permafrost detachment slides have yet to damage any infrastructure. But the two in the study did dam rivers, creating brand-new lakes and rapidly dumping sediment into the waterways downstream, Young said.

There are many other places in Canada and Alaska where the permafrost is 66 to 130 feet (20 to 40 m) deep and thus vulnerable to the same type of slide. This is especially true given the increasing intensity of wildfire at northern latitudes, Young said.

"This is almost a potential glimpse into the future of what we might be able to expect in these areas with changing forest fire dynamics," he said.

'> 'A potential glimpse into the future': Climate change has triggered 'permafrost landslides' with house-size blocks of ice in Canada

close up of cells lining the human gut, showing multicolored bacterial cells floating just above the gut cells

Scientists are looking to the gut microbiome for clues about why colorectal cancer is on the rise in young people. (Image credit: SEBASTIAN KAULITZKI/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY via Getty Images)

"Most of the research has really focused on the gut microbiome," the community of bacteria and other microbes that live in the gut, said Dr. Christopher Lieu, a professor of medical oncology at the University of Colorado Anschutz and a medical adviser to the nonprofit Colorectal Cancer Alliance.

Microbiome disruptions may spur inflammation, which, in turn, may trigger DNA mutations that cause cancer. But these mechanisms are complicated, Lieu told Live Science, and there likely isn't one simple reason young people's microbiomes may be getting disturbed.

"It's going to be extraordinarily more complex than that," he said.

Aggressive disease in young people

What researchers are starting to learn is that colorectal cancer in people in their early 20s or younger tends to be a more aggressive disease than that often seen in older people.

"We do feel like it is a bit of a distinct disease than what we're seeing in older adults," said Dr. Erica Arnold, a pediatric surgery research fellow at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. In October, Arnold presented new research on colorectal cancer in people ages 21 or younger at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Arnold and her colleagues analyzed the cases of 84 patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2023. They found that the median age of diagnosis was 16 years old and the median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was only 12 weeks long.

Only about 20% of the patients had a close relative with colorectal cancer, suggesting that for many of these young people, the disease did not necessarily emerge due to hereditary factors.

If you want my honest opinion, it does suggest that these cancers are developing differently.

Dr. Christopher Lieu, a professor of medical oncology at the University of Colorado Anschutz

Eighty percent of the study participants were diagnosed with Stage III or Stage IV disease, meaning the cancer had already spread locally and to lymph nodes or to other, distant organs when the patients were diagnosed. For comparison, in colorectal cancer patients of all ages, 60% are diagnosed in Stage III or IV, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In addition, Arnold said, one-third of the patients in their study had cellular markers of particularly aggressive cancer.

"Some of that might be related to delays in diagnosis," Lieu said, "but if you want my honest opinion, it does suggest that these cancers are developing differently."

The study's data was not nationally representative, but a recent analysis of CDC data has also found that colorectal cancer rates in youth are on the rise. In 1999, the diagnosis rate in kids ages 10 to 14 was 1 in a million. By 2020, it had risen to 6 in a million. For teens between 15 and 19, the rate of diagnosis went from 3 in a million to 13 in a million in that same time frame.

Unclear causes

There is no definitive reason for this rise, Lieu said. Research on the microbiome has suggested that processed food, antibiotic exposure in childhood, stress, reduced exercise and other lifestyle factors may contribute to this increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Some microbes may play a particularly strong role, at least in some cases of colorectal cancer. For instance, a specific variant of the common gut bacterium Escherichia coli is strongly associated with colorectal cancer; the variant carries a genetic segment and produces compounds that are toxic to genes. But this variant alone cannot explain all colorectal cancer cases in young people. Nor is it clear why the gut microbiome might be undergoing a shift in the first place.

"It may be a combination of food, antibiotic use and environmental exposures," Lieu suggested.

Regardless of the exact causes behind the cases, Arnold's new research pointed to the symptoms that deserve closer scrutiny in young people. Among the 84 patients in the study, 75% reported experiencing back and abdominal pain before their diagnosis, 45% had changes in their bowel movements, 43% experienced unexplained weight loss and 38% had rectal bleeding.

These are classic colorectal cancer symptoms, Arnold said, but they might be overlooked in this young age group because these same symptoms can have more common causes.

Parents should know that in most cases, stomach pain and gastrointestinal disruptions in kids are not caused by colorectal cancer, Lieu said, calling the cancer an "extraordinarily rare event." Nevertheless, pain or gastrointestinal upset that doesn't ease or that worsens over time needs a checkup, and symptoms like weight loss and blood in the stool are very unusual in kids and deserve extra attention.

"It's just important to investigate it to make sure we're catching colorectal cancer earlier rather than later in these patients," Arnold said.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

Help us improve Live Science Pro: We're always trying to make our content better. Leave us feedback about Pro here.

'> Colorectal cancer cases in kids have risen sixfold over past 2 decades ‪—‬ researchers are racing to understand why
Visits
Online User :
Today Visit :
Week Visit :
Month Visit :
Total Visit :
  • © 2013-2026
  • |
  • Scientific Indexing Services
3505 Brewster Drive, Plano, Texas, 75025, USA